My Theory On The Creation Of Everything

Composed by: Rev. Chris Pickens

Genesis 1:1

     In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth

 
Let me begin by saying that I do not think God made this universe in six days (remember, he rested on the 7th), and I also conclude that it might have taken billions of years for “evolution” to take control of our planet. For one to actually think about it, time is nothing more than an illusion created BY man due to the placement of the sun and moon in the sky, and the rotation of the Earth. On any other planet, whether bigger or smaller, would have different fluctuations in time as the smaller planet would spin faster, and the larger planet would spin slower.



Thus saying do I concur with science? Yes, kind of.

Surah70:4

    The angels and Gabriel ascend to Him in a Day the measure whereof is fifty thousand years. 

Do I negate the Religious story? No. I can only assume that thousands of years ago, man did not have the unblinking, revealing nature and reality of the cosmos.


Do I think that it is an error? Certainly not! That's a topic for another study about religious chronology and calendar studies.



Pure scientific findings consistently point to only one conclusion: the universe had a singular start, an explosion, where everything we know--the universe, time, space, scientific laws we observe--all had a beginning. If you have ever wanted to believe in God, but certainly did not want to do so in contradiction of known scientific facts, science provides you reason to believe that God exists and powerfully created all things.

It is logical to conclude that God, who is from the beginning, eternal and outside of time, CREATED time. God who is present everywhere and cannot be confined to space, created space. God who is spiritual, non-physical and outside of matter is the source of our universe and all that is. This is the message blatantly repeated throughout religion.



All discovery is limited by our own perceptions. Religion is filled with poetry and metaphorical language and though I am sure that there is no hidden pattern or clues hidden in it for a higher truth than the knowledge of science about our universe. I am sure that much of the religious language is not to be taken and interpreted literally, it should be within its context, translated and understood.

2 Timothy 3:16

     All Scripture is inspired by God and is useful to teach us what is true and to make us realize what is wrong in our lives. It corrects us when we are wrong and teaches us to do what is right.

 



So then where does that leave us on the creation case? 



Before I begin my explanation, I feel I must give you a crash course in my own personal theory of physics, to explain how God fits into it, and then how God DID in fact create the universe.

TheGuide of the Perplexed - The Sixth Argument
    One of the modern Mutakallemim thought that he had found a very good argument, much better than any advanced hitherto, namely, the argument based on the triumph of existence over non-existence. He says that, according to the common belief, the existence of the Universe is merely possible . for if it were necessary, the Universe would be God-but he seems to forget that we are at issue with those who, whilst they believe in the existence of God, admit at the same time the eternity of the Universe. -- The expression" A thing is possible" denotes that the thing may either be in existence or not in existence, and that there is not more reason why it should exist than why it should not exist.




The Physical Universe

One of the most hotly debated argument when it comes to proving or dis-proving God is “How  Was The Universe Created?”

THE SIBYLLINE ORACLES 1:10

     The King most high, who brought into existence The whole world, saying, "Let there be," and there was. For he the earth established, placing it Round about Tartarus3, and he himself Gave the sweet light; he raised the heaven on high.

 

Colossians 1:16

     For through him God created everything in the heavenly realms and on earth. He made the things we can see and the things we can't see--such as thrones, kingdoms, rulers, and authorities in the unseen world. Everything was created through him and for him.

Light-Energy-Mass-Gravity

"Einstein showed that matter and energy are equivalent, and the quantum theory demonstrated that both matter and energy share in a dual particle/wave nature."

Light

"If you wish to understand the secrets of the Universe, think of energy, frequency, and vibration." -- Nikola Tesla

The Secrets of Enoch 25:1-3

    I COMMANDED in the very lowest parts, that visible things should come down from invisible, and Adoil came down very great, and I beheld him, and lo! he had a belly of great light. And I said to him: 'Become undone, Adoil, and let the visible come out of thee.' And he came undone, and a great light came out. And I was in the midst of the great light, and as there is born light from light, there came forth a great age, and showed all creation, which I had thought to create.

If you were asked to make a list of all the things that give us light, what would you write?



Light bulbs, candles or campfires may be on your list. The sun is an important source, also.
Light is a form of energy and is a byproduct of an energy source that has been agitated (or charged) and produces a luminosity that travels omni-directionally in waves and is produced by hot, energetic objects.

Light bulbs are hot, energetic objects. If you have ever touched a light bulb while it is on, you know it is hot. You know the light bulb needs energy because you have to turn the light switch on to provide electricity for it. The electricity flows through either a thin metal wire or a gas. The wire or gas glows and gives off light when heated.

And since energy is either in particle or wave form (particles are physically manifested energy in the form of atoms), and waves are possibilities (of energy) that exist in the ‘void’, then energy is the expressed physicality of the universe and all material expression reveals itself in the form of vibrating energy.

The 3 Laws of Thermodynamics

1)  *There is a fixed amount of energy in the universe.  Energy cannot be created nor destroyed.  It can only be transferred from one system to another (E = mc²).

2)   *Energy (heat) cannot be transferred from a body at a lower temperature to a body with a higher temperature without the addition of energy.  Entropy is the loss of energy.

            *Albert Einstein declared that, of all the laws of physics, these two laws of thermodynamics would never be negated or replaced.

3)   If all of the energy in the universe was dispersed evenly, then a uniform temperature would exist everywhere, which is called 0° Kelvin (-273.15° Celsius or roughly -459.67° Fahrenheit). 

4)   Just for inclusion’s sake, a fourth law was created which is referred to as the zeroth law:  “If two thermodynamic systems are each in thermal equilibrium with a third, then they are in thermal equilibrium with each other.”

Mass 

Mass and weight are not the same thing.  The mass of an object is a measurement of how much matter it contains.  Mass through science has become quantifiable by different ways of measurement, but for our understanding we just need to know that:  Mass is a property of a physical object - that quantifies the amount of matter and energy it is equivalent to.

        

 

A golfball size of Uranium 'weighs' about 1 pound/ .5Kg and has about the same amount of energy as 1,000,000 gallons of gasoline.

The difference between mass and weight

Let’s say you were in a spacesuit floating around in outer space and you put a scale underneath yourself.  The scale would read zero because you are weightless in zero gravity.

Now, imagine you are in space and there are three balls weighing:

  1) much less than,

  2) the same as, and

  3) much more than you in space. 

If you tried to throw the small one it would fly away from you and you would be pushed back just a little. If you pushed the one that weighed the same as you away, you would both fly away from each other in opposite directions. When pushing the ball that is heavier than you away, you would fly back with much more momentum than the ball would because of the inertia of the ball.

It is currently thought - that the Higgs Boson (God particle) is what gives everything mass. 

What are we really made of?

 Dig deep and you'll find tiny particles held together by invisible forces in a sea of empty space. Dig even further and we discover that everything is made up of tiny packets of energy born in cosmic furnaces. It's energy that cools down, gets dragged through a mysterious form named the Higgs, and clumps together forming all of the things we call matter. It has an "evil- twin" called anti-matter. 

Hinduism is not predominantly earth-centred, and puts much emphasis on other "planes of existence" – various material abodes and the spiritual realm itself. This is reflected in Hindu stories and specifically through the concept of lila (divine pastime).These lilas take place in the spiritual world and are replicated at sacred locations on earth.

There is no one simple account of creation, and there are many detailed and inter-related stories. Central is the narration of the sacrifice of the primal being (purusha), found in the Rig Veda. On the metaphysical level, the universe is created from sound (vak). Sound corresponds to ether, the subtlest of the five material elements. According to such sankhya philosophy, the elements develop progressively from subtle to gross.

The atman, more subtle than any matter, generates his own successive material bodies. This world and its creatures are here to facilitate the soul's self-centred desires, and ultimately to enable his return to the spiritual world.

Matter

“All matter is considered to be built out of a complex intersection of waved motions, and the path of an individual particle is the result of the wave processes of the whole.” -- F. David Peat

Every ‘thing’ in the universe is matter. When an atom has a field of consciousness upon it - it is a particle (matter), when there is no field of consciousness upon an atom, it's a wave (existing in the void.)

In a nuclear explosion, particles of matter are ripped apart releasing energy. During the big bang - the exact opposite happened. An enormous amount of energy turned to matter. 

The electromagnetic vibrations of our consciousness interact with the energetic potential that exists everywhere as the life force to ‘collapse’ the waves and create matter.

Why matter ‘has’ mass is a mystery and is currently hoped to be answered by the Large Haldron Collider (CERN) in Switzerland.

(PRWEB) August 5, 2006 -- The usual three states of matter that we all know are Solid, Liquid and 
Gas. Modern science has discovered three other states which are plasma, beam and BEC  (Bose-Einstein Condensate). 
Plasma and beam are the fourth and fifth state of matter.  The BEC is the zero state of matter.

Gravity
Every object in the universe with mass attracts every other object with mass.  The amount of attraction depends on the amount of mass and how far apart they are. 

The moon revolves around the earth, the earth revolves around the sun, and the sun is just one star in a galaxy that is rotating in a swirling galaxy within millions of other swirling galaxies. You can’t jump away from the earth no matter how hard you try because the mass of the earth is so much greater than your mass that it pulls you in. If you were on the moon though you could jump 6 times higher, because the gravitational pull of the moon is 1/6th that of earth; or simply, the moon has less mass than the earth. If you were on Jupiter you would barely be able to stand up.

Because of gravity, the universe acts very much like a trampoline.  For instance, the mass of the earth causes a depression in the fabric of space, similar to a trampoline’s, which not even light can escape from. 

In actuality, the moon is traveling in a straight line, but the earth’s gravity counteracts the moon’s velocity giving it Centripetal  force, which balances it between ‘falling’ toward earth, or ‘falling’ into space. 

If you tossed a marble across a trampoline it would go in what looks like a straight line, but if you had a bowling ball in the middle causing a depression in the fabric, then the marble would follow an elliptical course codependent on the impression of the ball.

In actuality the mass of the bowling ball has changed the geometry of the trampoline's surface such that the marble is actually following a straight line. 

In a game of tennis for instance, the ball would be acted upon not only by the moon, but when taking causality to its extreme, even the nearby buildings and players themselves will cause warps in space-time. 

 For Newton gravity was action at a distance created by mass objects, but for Einstein gravity was discovered to be a curving of space-time that is brought about by matter and energy. 

  Summary – Physical Universe

The more light something has the more energy it has. --> The more energy it has the more mass it has.  --> The more mass it has the more gravity it has. - and vice-versa.

L = E = M = G

What also becomes apparent with time and sensitivity is that the more energy a person has, the lighter they personally feel and the more strength they personally have. This energy produces a personal lightness, which correlates to personal health as well as speed and agility.

Light turns out to be a funny word. The correlation between light – illumine, and light (opposite of heavy), makes you wonder if language scholars from years ago understood the similarities and thus called them the same thing based on their properties.

In E=mc², c refers to the speed of the illuminating kind of light, but coincidently enough, the more energy you have … the lighter you feel. Since Energy = mass, then the more energy someone has the more mass they will have, but … the lighter they will ‘feel’.

When a person is feeling either healthy, joyous, or energetic they 'feel' light, move light, and are light. When they feel sick, woeful, or unenergetic they 'feel' heavy, move heavy, and are heavy. 

So, the more energy something has, the light(er) it (as in its self) will feel.

Watch an example here:

 

Genesis 1:1 - 2

    In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.

AN ATHEIST VIEW:
HOW DID GOD CREATED SOMETHING OUT OF NOTHING? IT IS SCIENTIFICALLY IMPOSSIBLE!

The above is one of the many arguments that are thrown out at the Biblical case of Creation. Let me say that while I agree with the argument as it is a matter of fact, I can not understand some of the implications it produces.

Moses 2:1

    And it came to pass that the Lord spake unto Moses, saying: Behold, I reveal unto you concerning this heaven, and this earth; write the words which I speak. I am the Beginning and the End, the Almighty God; by mine Only Begotten I created these things; yea, in the beginning I created the heaven, and the earth upon which thou standest.

1. For something to be created it has to have a beginning. Since everything falls in the measuring tape of time, matter can not be produced from nothing since that would cancel the scientific fact and the atheist’s belief.

So to follow the atheist view, at some point in time, matter was formed.

BUT. . .

How it was formed?

This is a question that no scientist, or atheist for that matter, can answer. And for this argument to hold true, we have to assume position that matter was already present. Since the whole argument is that it can not be created from nothing, where did it come from? No one knows, and that begs the question about its origins.Looking at the sacred texts of all the major religions, the texts seem to describe what scientists have since discovered: there was an explosion of light and sound and a beginning to our universe...from outside of the universe itself. With it came the very start of space, matter and time. It was a singular starting point for everything. Over and over in the Book of Genesis is the description, "And God said...." followed by "...and it was so."

Stephen Hawking in his book “A Brief History of Time” writes about the origins of our universe, and he demonstrates the limits of our knowledge in Chapter: “Space and time” pages 14 to 19. Now don’t get me wrong. Hawking does not say that the Bible is right. In fact, he only tells us how it is impossible for us to know things that happened beyond a certain event of time.

An excerpt from the book. Please read the above specified pages to read the entire context.

———————

“Given an event P, one can divide the other events in the universe into three classes. Those events that can be reached from the event P by a particle or wave traveling at or below the speed of light are said to be in the future of P. They will lie within or on the expanding sphere of light emitted from the event P. Thus they will lie within or on the future light cone of P in the space-time diagram. Only events in the future of P can be affected by what happens at P because nothing can travel faster than light.

Similarly, the past of P can be defined as the set of all events from which it is possible to reach the event P traveling at or below the speed of light. It is thus the set of events that can affect what happens at P. The events that do not lie in the future or past of P are said to lie in the elsewhere of P.

What happens at such events can neither affect nor be affected by what happens at P. For example, if the sun were to cease to shine at this very moment, it would not affect things on earth at the present time because they would be in the elsewhere of the event when the sun went out.

We would know about it only after eight minutes, the time it takes light to reach us from the sun. Only then would events on earth lie in the future light cone of the event at which the sun went out. Similarly, we do not know what is happening at the moment farther away in the universe: the light that we see from distant galaxies left them millions of years ago, and in the case of the most distant object that we have seen, the light left some eight thousand million years ago. Thus, when we look at the universe, we are seeing it as it was in the past.”

————————–

What Hawking means is that light is the only source to see in the past or the future and as nothing travels faster than light than it is safe to assume that we can see events happening in the past only when the light energy radiated from them reaches us. But it also implies events that may as well occur outside of the cone of past and present and even beyond the reach of light since light tends to fade the farther it goes from its source. So, if an event is to occur outside the cone or beyond the cone of time, then we could not see it.

So it is suffice to say that an atheist can not tell you how matter originated for the first time. As Hawking describes, since the origin happened before we could actually trace it in time, and since it is impossible to calculate, it doesn’t matter since whatever happened can not alter in any way the present. Now this argument may define the case as rested for science but it lacks answer to their original argument of, how did matter originate? If it was there for eternity, we have no proof of that. And since one can not look back in time, a scientific follower simply assumes that matter can only be the result of preexisting matter, no matter how blank his data may be.

Why is it so easy to accept that matter has always existed, but hard to accept God has always existed?

Order of Ages 1:2 - 3

    Because God doth all things according to his infinite Wisdom, therefore there is no indifference of Will in him; and therefore, in all things he doth, he is a necessary Agent, and yet also the most free Agent. Therefore he did necessarily create the Worlds, and that not by constraint from any foreign Agent, but from the Determination of his internal Goodness and Wisdom.

2. If God made everything out from nothing than who made God? Since everything created must have a creator, that begs the question about God?

Now here is the second argument and it is very clever indeed. God created everything, a Christian would even go far as to say that even time is something that was designed by God. Now we can think of a simple Bible reader eager to defend his faith to be in error, but in truth I have found every other story to have its own drawbacks as well. Anyone who follows me on Facebook know this. For the question of knowing about God – one must step outside of the scientific realm and calculate the possibilities of a God.

What if, like the diagram in the section about black holes, I put God way past the point of light in the past cone. So technically, if there was to be a God, we can not see him, just as we can not see how the universe and matter originated for the first time.

Now, someone can say that it all started with a black hole and a huge supernova. Agreed. But that is merely an assumption of how it MAY have originated, since it is impossible to know otherwise, we are not even sure if the Big Bang actually happened at all.

So what if, hypothetically, God made everything from his own existence? One can say in a vague sort of way that if God is to be pure energy it/he/she might have had power to do so. And God is so far back in time that it is impossible scientifically to locate him. Then one can say that, yes. Something can be created, not from nothing but from God itself. Just like a part of himself.

Book of Jubilees 2:1 - 2

    And the angel of the face spoke to Moses by the command of the Lord, saying : " Write all the words of creation, how in six days the Lord God finished all the works which he created, and rested on the seventh day and sanctified it for all the years and established it as a sign for all his works." For on the first day he created the heavens above and the earth and the waters and all the spirits that serve before him, and the angels of the face and the angels- that cry "holy," and the angels of the spirit of fire,' and the angels of the spirit of wind, and the angels of the spirit of the clouds of darkness and of hail and of hoarfrost, and the angels of the abysses and of thunder and of lightning, and the angels of the spirits of cold and of heat, of winter and of spring and of fall and of summer and of all the spirits of the multitude of works which are in the heavens and on the earth and in all the depths, and of darkness and of light and of dawn and of evening which he has prepared in the knowledge of his heart. And at that time we saw his work and praised him and lauded before him on account of all his work, for seven great things did he make on the first day."

So, who made God?

Hmm, I would like to take the liberty here to think, not from the Bible and not from science either, but by logic itself.

If following science, matter can exist in eternity since nothing can be made from nothing. It had to exist. Taking that same approach I come to the conclusion that for everything to be created it has to have a creator since nothing can be created from nothing (as science says) and someone had to create it, and I say it was God’s own self that formed the universe. Life from life, power from power. For something to start it needs a trigger to be pulled and therefore for a kick start, God would be needed. He must exist! Simple kinetics demand it, because if matter can exist in eternity, why not God?! Since both are hidden and proven beyond observed time – impossible to trace to their origins – it seems plausible.

Let's break this down a little more.

First, I propose that:

1. Just as there is matter and anti-matter, there is also dark matter and dark anti-matter

2. Before the big bang, our universe was filled with large quantities of dark matter and nothing else.

Our universe currently consists of mostly matter and dark matter (as opposed to anti-matter or dark anti-matter). Matter and dark matter are compatible as we know, but I believe that just as anti-matter and matter destroy each other, the same happens when anti-matter comes in contact with dark matter and vice versa. At the moment of the big bang, the matter and anti matter that was created were equal (as most scientists believe), but due to the volume of dark matter that already existed, it worked hand in hand with matter to destroy the anti-matter, making our universe one dominated by matter.

The Universe

Imagine our universe to be shaped like a six sided cube, and there are an infinite number of parallel, or neighboring universes. Each universe, including our own, is surrounded by 6 other universes that fit together and touch each side like a puzzle piece. But every one of those six universes are the polar opposite to ours. Each one is an anti-matter universe and are filled with dark anti-matter. I propose that this pattern continues forever, where each universe is always boxed in on all sides by 6 opposite universes.

Gravity and black holes.

These exotic objects have captured our imagination ever since they were predicted by Einstein's Theory of General Relativity in 1915. 

I describe gravity in the standard way just as Einstein did, where the more massive an object, the more it warps the fabric of space. 

                                             What are black holes?

                                                                     Do they really exist?

                                                     How can we find them?

A star is a huge, massive fusion reactor. Because stars are so massive and made out of gas, there is an intense gravitational field that is always trying to collapse the star. The fusion reactions happening in the core are like a giant fusion bomb that is trying to explode the star. The balance between the gravitational forces and the explosive forces is what defines the size of the star.

As the star dies, the nuclear fusion reactions stop because the fuel for these reactions gets burned up. At the same time, the star's gravity pulls material inward and compresses the core. As the core compresses, it heats up and eventually creates a supernova explosion in which the material and radiation blasts out into space. What remains is the highly compressed, and extremely massive, core. The core's gravity is so strong that even light cannot escape. 

This object is now a black hole and literally disappears from view. Because the core's gravity is so strong, the core sinks through the fabric of space-time, creating a hole in space-time -- this is why the object is called a black hole.

Black holes are the most massive and dense objects in the universe. Their gravity is so strong, that not even light can escape. Anything that falls into one is ripped to pieces, including the very cells we are made of.

The core becomes the central part of the black hole called the singularity. The opening of the hole is called the event horizon.

You can think of the event horizon as the mouth of the black hole. Once something passes the event horizon, it is gone for good. Once inside the event horizon, all "events" (points in space-time) stop, and nothing (even light) can escape. The radius of the event horizon is called the Schwarzschild radius, named after astronomer Karl Schwarzschild, whose work led to the theory of black holes.

Types of Black Holes

There are two types of black holes:

* Schwarzschild - Non-rotating black hole

* Kerr - Rotating black hole

The Schwarzschild black hole is the simplest black hole, in which the core does not rotate. This type of black hole only has a singularity and an event horizon.

The Kerr black hole, which is probably the most common form in nature, rotates because the star from which it was formed was rotating. When the rotating star collapses, the core continues to rotate, and this carried over to the black hole (conservation of angular momentum). The Kerr black hole has the following parts:

- Singularity - The collapsed core

- Event horizon - The opening of the hole

- Ergosphere - An egg-shaped region of distorted space around the event horizon (The distortion is caused by the spinning of the black hole, which "drags" the space around it.) most likely caused by the extreme gravitational energy field.

- Static limit - The boundary between the ergosphere and normal space.

If an object passes into the ergosphere it can still be ejected from the black hole by gaining energy from the hole's rotation. However, if an object crosses the event horizon, it will be sucked into the black hole and never escape. What happens inside the black hole is unknown; even our current theories of physics do not apply in the vicinity of a singularity.

Even though we cannot see a black hole, it does have three properties that can or could be measured:

Mass

Electric charge

Rate of rotation (angular momentum)

As of now, we can only measure the mass of the black hole reliably by the movement of other objects around it. If a black hole has a companion (another star or disk of material), it is possible to measure the radius of rotation or speed of orbit of the material around the unseen black hole. The mass of the black hole can be calculated using Kepler's Modified Third Law of Planetary Motion or rotational motion.

How We Detect Black Holes

Although we cannot see black holes, we can detect or guess the presence of one by measuring its effects on objects around it. The following effects may be used:

- Mass estimates from objects orbiting a black hole or spiraling into the core

- Gravitational lens effects

- Emitted radiation

    ~Mass

 Many black holes have objects around them, and by looking at the behavior of the objects you can detect the presence of a black hole. You then use measurements of the movement of objects around a suspected black hole to calculate the black hole's mass.

What you look for is a star or a disk of gas that is behaving as though there were a large mass nearby. For example, if a visible star or disk of gas has a "wobbling" motion or spinning AND there is not a visible reason for this motion AND the invisible reason has an effect that appears to be caused by an object with a mass greater than three solar masses (too big to be a neutron star), then it is possible that a black hole is causing the motion. You then estimate the mass of the black hole by looking at the effect it has on the visible object.

For example, in the core of galaxy NGC 4261, there is a brown, spiral-shaped disk that is rotating. The disk is about the size of our solar system, but weighs 1.2 billion times as much as the sun. Such a huge mass for a disk might indicate that a black hole is present within the disk.

   ~ Gravity Lens

Einstein's General Theory of Relativity predicted that gravity could bend space. This was later confirmed during a solar eclipse when a star's position was measured before, during and after the eclipse. The star's position shifted because the light from the star was bent by the sun's gravity. Therefore, an object with immense gravity (like a galaxy or black hole) between the Earth and a distant object could bend the light from the distant object into a focus, much like a lens can.

the brightening of MACHO-96-BL5 happened when a gravitational lens passed between it and the Earth. When the Hubble Space Telescope looked at the object, it saw two images of the object close together, which indicated a gravitational lens effect. The intervening object was unseen. Therefore, it was concluded that a black hole had passed between Earth and the object.

    ~Emitted Radiation

When material falls into a black hole from a companion star, it gets heated to millions of degrees Kelvin and accelerated. The superheated materials emit X-rays, which can be detected by X-ray telescopes such as the orbiting Chandra X-ray Observatory.

The star Cygnus X-1 is a strong X-ray source and is considered to be a good candidate for a black hole. In addition to X-rays, black holes can also eject materials at high speeds to form jets. Many galaxies have been observed with such jets. Currently, it is thought that these galaxies have supermassive black holes (billions of solar masses) at their centers that produce the jets as well as strong radio emissions.

It is important to remember that black holes are not cosmic vacuum cleaners -- they will not consume everything. So although we cannot see black holes, there is indirect evidence that they exist. They have been associated with time travel and worm holes and remain fascinating objects in the universe.

At the center of most galaxies is a super massive black hole, which means the universe has billions of them. When galaxies collide their black holes envelope each other to become a super, super massive black hole. I believe that black holes are what ends the life of a universe. In the last quarter of our universes life (just a figure I threw out there), I believe there will be a hand full of black holes in our universe capable of swallowing up entire galaxies in the blink of an eye. The thing is, I also believe that there is a point where a black hole becomes so massive and dense that it goes from warping the fabric of space, to cutting a hole right through it.

It is my theory that when that critical mass is met, the gravity becomes so strong that it cuts, or falls completely through the boundaries of our universe into an adjacent anti-matter universe. It's just like if you were to push down on a steel rod in the center of a trampoline. You put all your weight and strength into it and it doesn't move, but As soon as the rod cuts through the fabric the rod shoots into the ground with tremendous force. So, at faster than the speed of light, that force propels all the dark matter that had fallen through the event horizon in the last fraction of a second of the black hole's life, into the dark anti-matter in the next universe creating an explosion larger than humans could ever comprehend.

In other words, black holes are what creates a "big bang".
A view of black holes first proposed in the late 1980s might be interpreted as shedding some light on the nature of classical white holes. Some researchers have proposed that when a black hole forms, a big bang may occur at the core, which would create a new universe that expands outside of the parent universe.

In general relativity, a white hole is a hypothetical region of spacetime which cannot be entered from the outside, although  matter  and light can escape from it. In this sense, it is the reverse of a black hole, which can only be entered from the outside, from which nothing, including light, can escape. White holes appear in the theory of eternal black holes. In addition to a black hole region in the future, such a solution of the Einstein field equations has a white hole region in its past.

THE FORBIDDEN RELIGION Chapter 3: TIME IS EVIL
    The bible doesn’t say so, but time started with the Big Bang. At the very start of creation when god said “Let there be light”, these four words could not have been spoken if time hadn’t existed. Time was created by the creator god when he created light. The first great explosion and expansion could not have existed without time. Time and space were created together and are thus inseparable. Time is the breath of the creator god. And all his creation, the expansion of the universe, the evolution of species, the gradual development of his plan, could not occur without time.

Since according to scientists, the matter contained at the core of a super massive black hole is basically the same as what they say existed a billionth of a second before the big bang in our own universe. This seems to be a plausible hypothesis.

However, this region does not exist for black holes that have formed through gravitational collapse, nor are there any known physical processes through which a white hole could be formed. No white hole has ever been observed. Also, the laws of thermodynamics say that the net entropy in the universe can either increase or remain constant. This rule is violated by white holes, as they tend to decrease entropy.

Like black holes, white holes have properties like mass, charge, and angular momentum. They attract matter like any other mass, but objects falling towards a white hole would never actually reach the white hole's event horizon (though in the case of the maximally extended Schwarzschild solution, discussed below, the white hole event horizon in the past becomes a black hole event horizon in the future, so any object falling towards it will eventually reach the black hole horizon). Imagine a gravitational field, without a surface. Acceleration due to gravity is the greatest on the surface of any body. But since black holes lack a surface, Acceleration due to gravity increases exponentially, but never reaches a value as there is no consideres surface in a singularity.

 In quantum mechanics, the black hole emits Hawking radiation and so can come to thermal equilibrium with a gas of radiation. Because a thermal-equilibrium state is time-reversal-invariant, Stephen Hawking argued that the time reverse of a black hole in thermal equilibrium is again a black hole in thermal equilibrium. This implies that black holes and white holes are the same object. The Hawking radiation from an ordinary black hole is then identified with the white-hole emission. Hawking's semi-classical argument is reproduced in a quantum mechanical AdS/CFT treatment, where a black hole in anti-de Sitter space* is described by a thermal gas in a gauge theory, whose time reversal is the same as itself. 

          *anti-de Sitter space

 In mathematics and physics, n-dimensional anti-de Sitter space, sometimes written AdS_n, is a maximally symmetric Lorentzian manifold with constant negative scalar curvature. It is the Lorentzian analogue of n-dimensional hyperbolic space, just as Minkowski space and de Sitter space are the analogues of Euclidean and elliptical spaces respectively. -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-de_Sitter_space 

Are you following me so far??


According to Hindu beliefs, with its cyclical notion of time, Hinduism teaches that the material world is created not once but repeatedly, time and time again. Additionally, this universe is considered to be one of many, all enclosed "like innumerable bubbles floating in space." Within this universe, there are three main regions: the heavenly planets, the earthly realm and the lower worlds. Scripture goes into some detail as to the nature of these regions and their respective inhabitants.

Whilst the Big Bang provided an explanation as to the origin of the universe, it still remained necessary to calculate its age.

To do so, astronomers once again rely on red shift to calculate the speeds and distance of the furthest galaxies and quasars. These distances give us indications to the age of the universe. The most distant quasars, which have velocities of some 240,000 km/sec. (80% the speed of light), are at distances of up to 14 billion light years (a light year being the distance travelled by light in one year). When we look into depth of space, we are actually looking back far into the past. When we look at that distant quasar, we are not seeing it as it is now, but as it was 14 billion years ago.

The calculation of the age of the universe during the last 70 years or so has fluctuated between 10 and 20 billion years.

It is interesting to know that the age of the universe has been mentioned in the Quran.

For that we look at two verses:

1) Surah 70:4
      "the angels and the spirit ascend unto Him in a day, the measure of which was fifty thousand years."

This verse refers to the ascent of angels and the spirit (meant to be Gabriel) back to heaven after settling all matters of life in the universe. The verse clearly said a day that "was" and not a day that "is", which clearly indicates that that day was in the past (50,000 years ago).

2) Surah 22:47
     "…a day relative to your God is equivalent to a thousand years of your count."

 

With a few simple equations:

If 1 day (for God) = 1000 years (for man)

1 year (for God) = 1000 x 365 (for man)

= 365,000 years

50,000 years (for God) = 365,000 x 50,000 (for man)

= 18.25 billion years!

The 50,000 years mentioned in verse 1 are meant to be of God's years and not of man. This is because man was not mentioned at all in that verse, and more importantly because the subject of the verse (creation of the universe) is obviously a matter executed by God and not by man and, so, its description must also be as related to God and not to man.

Parallel Universes

There was a time when “universe” meant “all there is.” Everything. The whole shabang. The notion of more than one universe, more than one everything, would seemingly be a contradiction in terms. Yet a range of theoretical developments has gradually qualified the interpretation of “universe.” To a physicist, the word’s meaning now largely depends on context. Sometimes “universe” still connotes absolutely everything. Sometimes it refers only to those parts of everything that someone such as you or I could, in principle, have access to. Sometimes it’s applied to separate realms, ones that are partly or fully, temporarily or permanently, inaccessible to us; in this sense, the word relegates ours to membership in a large, perhaps infinitely large, collection. 

 With its hegemony diminished, “universe” has given way to other terms introduced to capture the wider canvas on which the totality of reality may be painted. Parallel worlds or parallel universes or multiple universes or alternate universes or the metaverse, megaverse, or multiverse — they’re all synonymous and they’re all among the words used to embrace not just our universe but a spectrum of others that may be out there.

You’ll notice that the terms are somewhat vague. What exactly constitutes a world or a universe? What criteria distinguish realms that are distinct parts of a single universe from those classified as universes of their own? Perhaps someday our understanding of multiple universes will mature sufficiently for us to have precise answers to these questions. For now, we’ll use the approach famously applied by Justice Potter Stewart in attempting to define pornography. While the U.S. Supreme Court wrestled mightily to delineate a standard, Stewart declared simply and forthrightly, “I know it when I see it.”  

In the end, labeling one realm or another, a parallel universe is merely a question of language. What matters, what’s at the heart of the subject, is whether there exist realms that challenge convention by suggesting that what we’ve long thought to be the universe is only one component of a far grander, perhaps far stranger, and mostly hidden reality.

During the last half century, science has provided ample ways in which this possibility might be realized.

Moses1:35
    But only an account of this earth, and the inhabitants thereof, give I unto you. For behold, there are many worlds that have passed away by the word of my power. And there are many that now stand, and innumerable are they unto man; but all things are numbered unto me, for they are mine and I know them.

Varieties of Parallel Universes
A striking fact is that many of the major developments in fundamental theoretical physics— relativistic physics, quantum physics, cosmological physics, unified physics, computational physics—have led us to consider one or another variety of parallel universe. Some of the parallel universes are separated from us by enormous stretches of space or time; others are hovering millimeters away; the very notion of the location of others still proves parochial, devoid of meaning. A similar range of possibility is manifest in the laws governing the parallel universes. In some, the laws are the same as in ours; in others, they appear different but have shared a heritage; in others still, the laws are of a form and structure unlike anything we’ve ever encountered. It’s at once humbling and stirring to imagine just how expansive reality may be.

The phrase “heavenly places” or “heavenly realms” is used several times in the book of Ephesians (1:3, 20; 2:6; 3:10; 6:12). This phrase is translated from the Greek word epouranios, meaning “the sphere of spiritual activities.” “Heavenly realms” can refer to both angelic and demonic activity. Ephesians 1:20 says that God “raised Christ from the dead and seated him at his right hand in the heavenly realms.” But Ephesians 6:12 speaks of evil forces in the same realm: “Our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against . . . the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.”

As flesh-and-blood humans, we have very little understanding of the spirit world. We cannot see, hear, or touch it. However, the Bible assumes it, and we can glean insight into a world we cannot see by studying what God tells us about it. First of all, God is spirit (John 4:24). He exists outside the bounds of time, space, and matter. His home is called heaven (Acts 7:55; Isaiah 63:15), but this is a distinct place, not to be confused with “the heavens,” referring to the atmosphere (Genesis 1:1; Psalm 148:4), or the “heavenly realms,” which encompass all spirit beings. In God’s heaven, He sits on a throne (Matthew 23:22; Hebrews 4:16), surrounded by adoring angels (Revelation 7:11; Psalm 99:1) who exist to serve God and minister to His saints (Hebrews 1:14; Matthew 4:11; Genesis 19:1). Angels also have the ability to appear as men when sent to deliver messages from God (Genesis 18:2, 16–17; 19:1–2; Daniel 10:5–6).

Some of the earliest scientific forays into parallel worlds were initiated in the 1950s by researchers puzzling over aspects of quantum mechanics, a theory developed to explain phenomena taking place in the microscopic realm of atoms and subatomic particles. Quantum mechanics broke the mold of the previous framework, classical mechanics, by establishing that the predictions of science are necessarily probabilistic. We can predict the odds of attaining one outcome, we can predict the odds of another, but we generally can’t predict which will actually happen. This well-known departure from hundreds of years of scientific thought is surprising enough. But there’s a more confounding aspect of quantum theory that receives less attention. After decades of closely studying quantum mechanics, and after having accumulated a wealth of data confirming its probabilistic predictions, no one has been able to explain why only one of the many possible outcomes in any given situation actually happens. When we do experiments, when we examine the world, we all agree that we encounter a single definite reality. Yet, more than a century after the quantum revolution began, there is no consensus among the world’s physicists as to how this basic fact is compatible with the theory’s mathematical expression.

Over the years, this substantial gap in understanding has inspired many creative proposals, but the most startling was among the first. Maybe, that early suggestion went, the familiar notion that any given experiment has one and only one outcome is flawed. The mathematics underlying quantum mechanics — or at least, one perspective on the math — suggests that all possible outcomes happen, each inhabiting its own separate universe. 

This tantalizing Many Worlds approach to quantum mechanics has attracted much interest in recent decades. But investigations have shown that it’s a subtle and thorny framework; so, even today, after more than half a century of vetting, the proposal remains controversial. Some quantum practitioners argue that it has already been proven correct, while others claim just as assuredly that the mathematical underpinnings don’t hold together.

What is beyond doubt is that this early version of parallel universes resonated with themes of separate lands or alternative histories that were being explored in literature, television, and film, creative forays that continue today. (Examples would include The Wizard of Oz, It’s a Wonderful Life, Alice in Wonderland/Through the Looking Glass, The Hobbit/Lord of the Rings, the Star Trek episode “The City on the Edge of Forever,” and, more recently, Sliding Doors and Run Lola Run). Collectively, these and many other works of popular culture have helped integrate the concept of parallel realities into the zeitgeist and are responsible for fueling much public fascination with the topic. But the mathematics of quantum mechanics is only one of numerous ways that a conception of parallel universes emerges from modern physics.

Instead of That balloon, imagine a bubble.

Below, an artist used logarithmic maps and satellite images to create this piece of artwork that is out of this world. Pablo Carlos Budassi took our massive universe and compiled it into a single a breathtakingly, colourful image, an image that looks a lot like a bubble. The image includes showcases of everything from the sun to the Andromeda galaxy to the plasma left behind billions of years ago by the Big Bang.

Now, what if our entire universe was nothing more than a gigantic bubble? This picture is nothing more than a 2-D representation of a 6-D bubble we live in. I will get to more of this later. Ad we live the same for a jog among the space of other multi-universes all pressed together, such as bubbles coming out of a bubble machine? As in a bubble machine, all of the bubbles are pressed together and shoot "sprouts" (for lack of a better term) in every happened and a star on you space time vortex to spend fast enough.

The design is based on the logarithmic maps put together by Princeton University and images taken by NASA with telescopes and satellites. Logarithmic maps let us visualise extremely large areas, because each 'step' on the axes increases by a factor of 10. 

In the center of the image is the glowing sun, then each planet is placed where it is in our Solar System. Budassi captured the outer rings of the Milky Way, the Kuiper belt, Oort cloud, Alpha Centauri star, Perseus Arm, other nearby galaxies, the cosmic microwave radiation leftover from the Big Bang and ended with the ring of plasma also from the Big Bang.

The researchers from Princeton University created their maps using data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), which used a 2.5-meter, wide-angle optical telescope at the Apache Point Observatory in New Mexico. Their detailed three-dimensional maps included more than 3 million astronomical objects, according to an article in Science Alert. 

SDSS has measured images for tens of millions of galaxies and three-dimensional positions (using redshifts obtained from spectra of these galaxies) of about 500,000 objects. Our universe was created about  18.25 billion years ago and since then it has been growing at a fast pace. Scientists believe the oldest photons they have studied traveled 45 to 47 billion light years since the beginning of our universe or the Big Bang. This means the universe we know is about 93 billion light-years wide.

So, Our universe has expanded outward of 93 billion light-years wide in 18.25 billion years.

The actual speed of that would be: 1,527,709,512 miles / second


 THAT'S FAST!!

The speed of light is one of the most important fundamental properties of nature; it’s used in a number of ways, not limited to certain technologies, distance measurement, interplanetary spacecraft communications, and in various mathematical calculations (it is a constant, after all). Of course, as many of you know, the speed at which it travels through a vacuum—186,282 miles (299,792 kilometers) per second—is static (or never changing), if you remove that variable, the very foundation of modern physics crumbles. 

This past October, astronomers had a glimpse of a parallel universe bumping against our own.

Scientists say they have seen hints in signals from the furthest reaches of space that suggest the fabric of our universe is being disrupted by another quite different universe. The analysis could provide one of the first pieces of proof of the multi-verse theory, which says there are many alternate universes.

This being the idea, if you have a whole lot of univereses, or a multi-verse, it would, in MY theory, look a little like this painting By Diane Streicher @ Diane Again.

Dr Ranga-Ram Chary, a researcher at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, examined data from the cosmic microwave background gathered by the European Space Agency's Planck Space Telescope. Within this glow left over from the moments after the Big Bang, he discovered a number of spots where the microwave light is far brighter than it should be. 

These, he claims, may be signals caused by the interaction between our universe and another one a few hundred thousand years after the Big Bang around  18.25 billion years ago. According to New Scientist, which first reported the Dr Chary's research, this is akin to two bubbles bumping into each other.

These so-called 'bubble universes', which are expanding within the multiverse, bumped into each other as they expanded after the Big Bang, leaving an imprint on each other's outer surface.

 A view of black holes first proposed in the late 1980s might be interpreted as shedding some light on the nature of classical white holes. Some researchers have proposed that when a black hole forms, a big bang may occur at the core, which would create a new universe that expands outside of the parent universe. 

This picture looks a lot like either nerve endings, or the wax inside a lava lamp.
  

Essentially, a new universe "buds" off of another universe performing something like asexual reproduction. However, like with living organisms, when any kind of reproduction occurs, their DNA and RNA can change the properties of the offspring creating new changes in the new organism.

My theory surmises that a developing black hole causes the emergence of a new universe on the "other side", whose fundamental constant parameters (masses of elementary particles, Planck constant, elementary charge, and forms of physics as we know them) may differ slightly from those of the universe where the black hole was created. Each universe thus gives rise to as many new universes as it has black holes. The theory contains the evolutionary ideas of "reproduction" and "mutation" of universes, and so is 
formally analogous to models of population biology. 

One of the more controversial claims comes from Stanford physicist Andri Linde, who contends that Big Bangs are proliferating in a fractal universe higher than we can comprehend.

The subject of parallel universes is highly speculative. No experiment or observation has established that any version of the idea is realized in nature, for the exception of the work of Dr Ranga-Ram Chary.

If a quantum calculation predicts that a particle might be here, or it might be there, then in one universe it is here, and in another it is there. And in each such universe, there’s a copy of you witnessing one or the other outcome, thinking — incorrectly — that your reality is the only reality. When you realize that quantum mechanics underlies all physical processes, from the fusing of atoms in the sun to the neural firing that constitutes the stuff of thought, the far-reaching implications of the proposal become apparent. It says that there’s no such thing as a road untraveled. Yet each such road — each reality — is hidden from all others. 

The expansion of the universe is actually very simple. If "space" is roughly 0° Kelvin, and the Big Bang (the speaking of God) was the result of a white hole opening up, then the heat from the white hole would cause the expansion, similar to the way a hot air balloon works. The more heat that is added, the more expanded it becomes. If we have random white holes opening and closing, then they would allow for more heat and pressure to expand further, just like how one would randomly fire up the balloon to keep it up in the air.
 

Well, that's my theory of creation anyway....